Re: [PATCH] Introduce -Wimplicit-fallthrough={0,1,2,3,4,5}

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 10/12/2016 12:08 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:

Actually looking more closely it appears that all of the 136 additional
warnings for level 2 are bogus, too. Here is an example:
         switch (class) {
         case ATA_DEV_SEMB:
                 class = ATA_DEV_ATA;    /* some hard drives report SEMB sig */
         case ATA_DEV_ATA:
         case ATA_DEV_ZAC:
                 tf.command = ATA_CMD_ID_ATA;
                 break;

Another interesting question would be, how many of the level 1 warnings 
are false positives? But I'm not going to make you go through all 951 of 
them.


Bernd