Approved.
Please commit.

2016-09-26 15:30 GMT+03:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
<senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com>:
> Ping!
>
> Regards
> Senthil
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   Is it ok to backport PR 65210 to gcc-5-branch? The patch is already in
>>   6.x and trunk.
>>
>> Regards
>> Senthil
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog
>>
>> 2016-09-22  Senthil Kumar Selvaraj  <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com>
>>
>>       Backport from trunk r227496
>>
>>       PR target/65210
>>       * config/avr/avr.c (avr_eval_addr_attrib): Look for io_low
>>       attribute as well.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>> 2016-09-22  Senthil Kumar Selvaraj  <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com>
>>
>>       Backport from trunk r227496
>>
>>       PR target/65210
>>       * gcc.target/avr/pr65210.c: New test.
>>
>> Index: gcc/config/avr/avr.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/config/avr/avr.c      (revision 240340)
>> +++ gcc/config/avr/avr.c      (working copy)
>> @@ -9122,6 +9122,8 @@
>>        if (SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS (x) & SYMBOL_FLAG_IO)
>>       {
>>         attr = lookup_attribute ("io", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl));
>> +       if (!attr || !TREE_VALUE (attr))
>> +         attr = lookup_attribute ("io_low", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl));
>>         gcc_assert (attr);
>>       }
>>        if (!attr || !TREE_VALUE (attr))
>>        Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/avr/pr65210.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/avr/pr65210.c    (nonexistent)
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/avr/pr65210.c    (working copy)
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +
>> +/* This testcase exposes PR65210. Usage of the io_low attribute
>> +   causes assertion failure because code only looks for the io
>> +   attribute if SYMBOL_FLAG_IO is set. */
>> +
>> +volatile char q __attribute__((io_low,address(0x81)));
>

Reply via email to