On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> for (tree t = lvl->names; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
> {
> + /* OVERLOADs or decls from using declaration are wrapped into
> + TREE_LIST. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (t) == TREE_LIST)
> + {
> + t = TREE_VALUE (t);
> + t = OVL_CURRENT (t);
> + }Don't we want the loop increment to take the TREE_CHAIN of the TREE_LIST element, rather than its TREE_VALUE? Jason
