On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > On 01/08/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > > > On 11/07/16 18:55, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > > On 07/11/2016 04:52 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > > > Based on that, I think that code block is a useful optimisation, we just > > > > need > > > > to take care with immediates. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Yeah, I think the patch is ok. > > > > > > > This patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00017.html) has > > been in trunk > > for a month with no reported problems. > > > > I'd like to backport it to the GCC 5 and 6 branches. > > I've bootstrapped and tested it there on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. > > > > Sorry for the early ping but given that GCC 6.2 is due shortly and I'm away > next week, > could I please backport this patch to the GCC 6 branch?
Generally patches approved for the trunk that fix regressions can be backported without further approval. Richard. > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > Ok? > > > > Thanks, > > Kyrill > > > > > > > > Bernd > > > > > > > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
