On 07/12/2016 04:18 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > > On 07/08/2016 04:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 07/08/2016 02:54 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >>> On 07/08/2016 01:59 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>>> >>>> Gah, that's not right, that'll swap the numbers of kept/removed loops. >>>> >>>> I think the right answer is simply >>>> for (i = 0; i < n - IRA_MAX_LOOPS_NUM; i++) >>>> >>>> >>>> Bernd >>> >>> Thank you for the help, I've been testing the suggested change. >>> >>> Martin >>> >> >> It survives regression tests and bootstrap. >> May I install the patch? > > Sure. > > > Bernd >
All active branches are also affected, hope it's fine that I'll commit the same patch as soon as regression tests and bootstrap finishes? Thanks, Martin
