On 07/08/2016 04:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:54 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 07/08/2016 01:59 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:

Gah, that's not right, that'll swap the numbers of kept/removed loops.

I think the right answer is simply
  for (i = 0; i < n - IRA_MAX_LOOPS_NUM; i++)


Bernd

Thank you for the help, I've been testing the suggested change.

Martin


It survives regression tests and bootstrap.
May I install the patch?

Sure.


Bernd

Reply via email to