On 07/08/2016 04:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:54 PM, Martin Liška wrote:On 07/08/2016 01:59 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:Gah, that's not right, that'll swap the numbers of kept/removed loops. I think the right answer is simply for (i = 0; i < n - IRA_MAX_LOOPS_NUM; i++) BerndThank you for the help, I've been testing the suggested change. MartinIt survives regression tests and bootstrap. May I install the patch?
Sure. Bernd