> On Jul 11, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 07/08/2016 08:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> Hello >> >> Following patch fixes fallout caused by the patch set: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2016-07/msg00097.html >> >> Ready after it finished regression tests? >> Thanks, >> Martin >> >> >> 0001-Fix-Fortran-DO-loop-fallback.patch >> >> >> From c5dd7ad62f795cce560c7f1bb8767b7ed9298d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz> >> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:51:54 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> 2016-07-08 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> >> >> * gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90: Update expected dump scan. >> * gfortran.dg/pr42108.f90: Likewise. >> * gfortran.dg/vect/pr62283.f: Likewise. > Shouldn't ldist-1.f90 be scan-tree-dump-not? It seems like you change it > from that just last week, but it wasn't mentioned in the ChangeLog. > > OK with that change.
A gentle reminder, fortran patches should include the fortran list...
