On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 07:01:47PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Now the first comment I have about this, about which I'd like to have some
> feedback, is that the gcc_unreachable () at the end of
> build_simple_base_path without a return seems a bit weird to me, because the
> function is *supposed to return a tree*, not void. I guess some front-ends
> would even warn on this?!? Anyway, if we change:
>
>
> /* */
>
> gcc_unreachable ();
> }
I'll just comment on this. gcc_unreachable () is a noreturn function,
so this is perfectly fine IMHO.
Jakub
