On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes >> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping >> this (short of historic reasons)? > I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the > GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should > be limited anyway.
Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to start this removal? Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now? ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.) Gerald
