On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:38:27PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This patch improves the location of the error message about taking the address
> of a bit-field. While at it, I also fixed two other similar spots.
>
> Not a regression, but given its extreme triviality I thought this could have
> gone in even at this time.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2016-04-15 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> PR c/70671
> * c-typeck.c (build_unary_op): Pass location down to error and
> warning call.
>
> * gcc.dg/bitfld-22.c: New test.
Ok.
Jakub
