Hi Christian,
On 22/01/16 14:07, Christian Bruel wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On 01/21/2016 01:22 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christian,
On 21/01/16 10:36, Christian Bruel wrote:
The current arm_set_current_function was both awkward and buggy. For instance
using partially set TARGET_OPTION set from pragma_parse, while
restore_target_globalsnor arm_option_params_internal was not reset. Another
issue is that in some
paths, target_reinit was not called due to old cached
target_option_current_node value. for instance with
foo{}
#pragma GCC target ...
foo was called with global_options set from old GCC target (which was wrong)
and correct rtl values.
This is a reimplementation of the function. Hoping to be easier to read (and
maintain). Solves the current issues seen so far.
regtested for arm-linux-gnueabi -mfpu=vfp, -mfpu=neon,-mfpu=neon-fp-armv8
Thanks for the patch, I'll try it out.
In the meantime there's a couple of style and typo nits...
+ /* Make sure that target_reinit is called for next function, since
+ TREE_TARGET_OPTION might change with the #pragma even if there are
+ no target attribute attached to the function. */
s/attribute/attributes
- arm_previous_fndecl = fndecl;
+ /* if no attribute, use the mode set by the current pragma target. */
+ if (! new_tree)
+ new_tree = target_option_current_node;
+
s/if/If/
+ /* now target_reinit can save the state for later. */
+ TREE_TARGET_GLOBALS (new_tree)
+ = save_target_globals_default_opts ();
s/now/Now/
While playing on my side. I realized that we could simplify the patch further
by removing the need to set and use target_option_current_node, since this is
redundant with what handle_pragma_push/pop_options does.
Also since that the functions inside a pragma GCC target region will have
DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET set already, we don't seem to need a special case
for those.
With this V2, arm_set_current_function is becoming more minimalist and still
fixes the current issues. Could you test this version instead ?
Thanks, I'll check this out instead.
I've played a bit with your previous version and the effect on the testcases
looked ok, but I have a couple of
comments on the testcase in the meantime
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69245.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69245.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69245.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR target/69245 */
+/* Test that pop_options restores the vfp fpu mode. */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_fp_ok } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_fp } */
+
+#pragma GCC target "fpu=vfp"
+
+#pragma GCC push_options
+#pragma GCC target "fpu=neon"
+int a, c, d;
+float b;
+static int fn1 ()
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#pragma GCC pop_options
+
+void fn2 ()
+{
+ d = b * c + a;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\.fpu vfp" 1 } } */
PR 69245 is an ICE whereas your testcase doesn't ICE without the patch, it just
fails the
scan-assembler check. I'd like to have the testcase trigger the ICE without
your patch.
For that we need -O2 in dg-options.
Also, the "fpu=vfp" pragma you put in the beginning doesn't allow the ICE to
trigger, presumably
because it triggers a different path through the pragma option popping code.
So removing that pragma and instead changing the dg-add-options from arm_fp to
arm_vfp3 (which is
floating-point without the vfma instruction causes the ICE) does the trick for
me.
Also the "fpu=neon" pragma should also be changed to be "fpu=neon-vfpv4"
because that setting allows
the vfma instruction which is being wrongly considered in fn2().
I suppose you'll then want to change the scan-assembler directive to look for
\.fpu vfp3.
Thanks,
Kyrill
