On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Patrick Palka <patr...@parcs.ath.cx> wrote: > There is a minor inconsistency in the folding behavior within the C > frontend. The C frontend does not currently fold the expression "x", > where x is a const int, yet the FE does fold the expression "x + 0". > > This happens because decl_constant_value is called in c_fully_fold only > while recursing over the operands of the expression being folded, i.e. > there is no top-level call to decl_constant_value to handle the case > where the expression being folded happens to be a singular expression > such as "x", as opposed to "x + 5" (where x is a const variable). > > To fix this inconsistency, this patch calls decl_constant_value in > c_fully fold after folding the given expression. > > Bootstrap + regtest in progress on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit if > testing succeeds? > > gcc/c/ChangeLog: > > * c-fold.c (c_fully_fold): Call > decl_constant_value_for_optimization after folding > the given expression. > * c-typeck.c (digest_init): Remove redundant call to > decl_constant_value_for_optimization. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c: New test. > --- > gcc/c/c-fold.c | 1 + > gcc/c/c-typeck.c | 1 - > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c > > diff --git a/gcc/c/c-fold.c b/gcc/c/c-fold.c > index c554e17..ab0b37f 100644 > --- a/gcc/c/c-fold.c > +++ b/gcc/c/c-fold.c > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ c_fully_fold (tree expr, bool in_init, bool *maybe_const) > } > ret = c_fully_fold_internal (expr, in_init, maybe_const, > &maybe_const_itself, false); > + ret = decl_constant_value_for_optimization (ret); > if (eptype) > ret = fold_convert_loc (loc, eptype, ret); > *maybe_const &= maybe_const_itself; > diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c > index b691072..4886fc2 100644 > --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c > +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c > @@ -6791,7 +6791,6 @@ digest_init (location_t init_loc, tree type, tree init, > tree origtype, > inside_init = TREE_OPERAND (inside_init, 0); > } > inside_init = c_fully_fold (inside_init, require_constant, &maybe_const); > - inside_init = decl_constant_value_for_optimization (inside_init); > > /* Initialization of an array of chars from a string constant > optionally enclosed in braces. */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9f043b8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-const-1.c > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-gimple -fdump-tree-ccp1" } */ > + > +extern void dummy (const void *); > + > +int > +f1 (void) > +{ > + const int x = 7; > + dummy (&x); > + return x; > +} > + > +void foo (int); > + > +void > +f2 (void) > +{ > + const int x = 7; > + foo (x); > +} > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "foo \\(7\\);" "gimple" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "return 7;" 2 "ccp1" } } */
Oops, this last dg-final line should say { scan-tree-dump "return 7;" "ccp1" } of course.