On 26/11/15 15:42 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/11/15 19:55 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 November 2015 at 17:29, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawre...@arm.com> wrote:
On 16/11/15 21:04, Doug Evans wrote:
Hi.
Apologies for the delay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
Tested with current trunk.
2015-11-16 Doug Evans <d...@google.com>
PR libstdc++/67440
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (find_type): Handle "const" in
type name.
* testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc: Add test for
const set<int>.
* testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc: Ditto.
* testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple11.cc: Ditto.
On gcc-5-branch, the debug.cc and simple.cc tests don't seem to compile, on
either x86_64-none-linux-gnu or aarch64-none-linux-gnu. I get errors like:
/work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:
In function 'int main()':
/work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:77:43:
error: in C++98 'const_intset' must be initialized by constructor, not by
'{...}'
const std::set<int> const_intset = {2, 3};
^
Which should have failed to compile on trunk as well, but we're
missing a -std=gnu++98 in the simple.cc testcase, so on trunk it uses
the -std=gnu++14 default. I'll add -std=gnu++98 to the test.
I've committed this to trunk, and will apply it to gcc-5-branch after
I finish testing it on the branch.
Doh, but I need to fix debug.cc as well, another patch coming ...
