On 25 November 2015 at 17:29, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawre...@arm.com> wrote: > On 16/11/15 21:04, Doug Evans wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> Apologies for the delay. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440 >> >> Tested with current trunk. >> >> 2015-11-16 Doug Evans <d...@google.com> >> >> PR libstdc++/67440 >> * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (find_type): Handle "const" in >> type name. >> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc: Add test for >> const set<int>. >> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc: Ditto. >> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple11.cc: Ditto. > > > On gcc-5-branch, the debug.cc and simple.cc tests don't seem to compile, on > either x86_64-none-linux-gnu or aarch64-none-linux-gnu. I get errors like: > > /work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc: > In function 'int main()': > /work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:77:43: > error: in C++98 'const_intset' must be initialized by constructor, not by > '{...}' > const std::set<int> const_intset = {2, 3}; > ^
Which should have failed to compile on trunk as well, but we're missing a -std=gnu++98 in the simple.cc testcase, so on trunk it uses the -std=gnu++14 default. I'll add -std=gnu++98 to the test.