On Thursday 04 August 2011 23:46:08 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:36:11PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > On Thursday 04 August 2011 22:45:34 Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > > > There might be still some missing or wrong cleanups, but most > > > > remaining .mod files are from gfortran.fortran-torture. > > > > > > Yes, you missed a few. > > > > And you missed my two patches from yesterday. ;-) > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00015.html > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00017.html > > I saw your emails. Note that I didn't say you missed them. :-)
> I did not read your patches. > My statement above is correct. Tobias missed a > few. :-) I had a testsuite cleanup patch sitting > in my tree for several weeks/months; never got > around to committing it. > > ps: bessel_6.f90 is broken, but it won't show up > until glibc finally fixes its libm. > > > Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 > =================================================================== > --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (revision 177414) > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (working copy) > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > implicit none > real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9, > 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78] real,parameter :: > myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) & > - * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 75, 15 ] > + * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ] > ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit > ! more tolerant > ! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ] If you are seeking approval for this, it is OK. Mikael
