On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:47:23AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> OK to checkin?
> 2015-10-21 Steve Ellcey <sell...@imgtec.com>
> Andrew Pinski <apin...@cavium.com>
>
> PR rtl-optimization/67736
> * combine.c (simplify_comparison): Use gen_lowpart_or_truncate instead
> of gen_lowpart when we had a truncating and.
This is okay for mainline, and the release branches after the usual delay
and watching for fallout.
> 2015-10-21 Steve Ellcey <sell...@imgtec.com>
> Andrew Pinski <apin...@cavium.com>
>
> PR rtl-optimization/67736
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr67736.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/combine-subregs.c: New test.
One nit and maybe a problem:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/combine-subregs.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/combine-subregs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fexpensive-optimizations" } */
-fexpensive-optimizations is default at -O2.
> +
> +#include <inttypes.h>
Does every target have that header? Shouldn't it be <stdint.h>?
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67736.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67736.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
And here you don't need inttypes at all? Confused.
Segher
