On Jul 23, 2015, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking >> this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end): > Unfortunately it causes about a thousand test fails on powerpc64-linux > (at least, it seems to be this patch, I haven't actually checked). > Some representative backtraces: Thanks, both of these are now fixed (at least in that they don't ICE any more) in the git branch aoliva/pr64164, but I'm going to investigate a few more issues before I start a regression test on gcc110 and gcc112. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer
