On Jul 24, 2015, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > Did you commit the final, complete version of the patches?
Yes, I have double-checked that reverting the patch I posted on the r225979 tree I used for testing reverts it to the base revision, except for unrelated libgfortran configury changes that I used to avoid halting configure in cross builds, to increase the amount of code build during the cross testing. > Did you test the version of the patches that you committed? Yes, I have just double-checked that the version I tested is identical to the change introduced by commit 226113, except for the ChangeLogs and the libgfortran configury change. It could be that some other change between 225979 and 226112, combined with 226113, caused the regression. Or it could be that my i686-pc-linux-gnu "native" testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu is somehow faulty. I'll look into it and try to find out what the source of the difference in test results H.J. and I get could be. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer
