On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:08:50PM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > Please find attached a new version of the patch that fixes the > inconsistency with the standard, pointed out by Reinhold. It is weird > but a read the appropriate part of the standard several times and > simply did not pick up the critical information :-) > > Note that the delimiter used for submodule file name is '@', whereas > the internal identifiers is '.'. > > I have added a procedure to cleanup submodules produced by the > testsuite and implemented them in submodule_[1-8].f90. Submodule_8.f90 > tests the resolution of the spurious error found by Reinhold. > > Booststraps and regtests on FC_21/x86_64 - OK for trunk? >
Patch looks ok to me. One item I wonder if we need to care about is old filesytems (FAT) or operating systems (VMS) with a 3 character file extension limit. -- Steve
