On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Tobias Grosser <tob...@grosser.es> wrote:
>> On 07/02/2015 06:52 PM, Aditya Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 2015-07-02  Aditya Kumar  <aditya...@samsung.com>
>>>             Sebastian Pop  <s....@samsung.com>
>>>
>>>          * graphite-sese-to-poly.c (rewrite_cross_bb_scalar_deps):
>>>         Point iterator to use_stmt.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Aditya,
>>
>> this patch does not explain what was wrong and why this change is correct.
>> Could you possibly add such an explanation.
>
> One of the code refactorings introducing phi node iterators modified
> the semantics of this code as described below ...
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Bug introduced by patch:
>>> git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@217787
>
> ... here.
> If you git log grep for this commit, you would see that this patch
> reverts this "typo" introduced in a very large patch.
>

How about a testcase or 2 or mentioning if it is covered by existing
testcases ? And Aditya you may find it instructive to read this
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches

regards
Ramana


> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
>>> ---
>>>   gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c | 7 +++----
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
>>> index 271c499..78f10e4 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
>>> @@ -2458,11 +2458,10 @@ rewrite_cross_bb_scalar_deps (scop_p scop,
>>> gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
>>>     handle_scalar_deps_crossing_scop_limits (scop, def, stmt);
>>>
>>>     FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, imm_iter, def)
>>> -    if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI
>>> -       && (res = true))
>>> +    if (gphi *phi = dyn_cast <gphi *> (use_stmt))
>>>         {
>>> -       gphi_iterator psi = gsi_start_phis (gimple_bb (use_stmt));
>>> -
>>> +       res = true;
>>> +       gphi_iterator psi = gsi_for_phi (phi);
>>>         if (scalar_close_phi_node_p (gsi_stmt (psi)))
>>>           rewrite_close_phi_out_of_ssa (scop, &psi);
>>>         else
>>>
>>

Reply via email to