On 03/05/2015 22:19, François Dumont wrote:
On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
(Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for
__miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base<> or just two overloads of
__miter_base()?)
Definitely, I already have a patch for that.
Great :-)
And here is the patch for this part.
I have implemented it in such a way that it will also remove several
layers of move_iterator.
2015-05-04 François Dumont <fdum...@gcc.gnu.org>
* include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
(std::move_iterator): Delete declaration.
(std::__is_move_iterator<move_iterator>): Move partial
specialization...
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h: ... here.
(std::__miter_base): Overloads for std::reverse_iterator and
std::move_iterator.
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (std::__miter_base): Provide default
implementation.
Tested under Linux x86_64.
Ok to commit ?
Is it ok ?
François
