On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
(Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for
__miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base<> or just two overloads of
__miter_base()?)
Definitely, I already have a patch for that.
Great :-)
It might be simpler to just add __make_reverse_iterator for >= 201103L
and then always use std::__make_reverse_iterator instead of a macro.
That's similar to what we do for std:__addressof and std:addressof.
Ok, attached is the patch I have plan to commit then that I am testing
at the moment.
Looks good, OK for trunk assuming the tests pass.
Thanks!
