On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> wrote:
> Thanks, > I could've sworn I had sent this version out a couple hours ago. > My mail client has been playing up. > > Here it is with 6 tests. For the tests corresponding to f1/f3 in my > example above I scan that we don't use the 'w1' reg. > > I'll give the AArch64 maintainers to comment on the tests for a day or two > before committing. Using scan-assembler-times is more robust than scan-assembler. Otherwise, OK by me. /Marcus > Thanks, > Kyrill > > 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> > > * expmed.c: (synth_mult): Only assume overlapping > shift with previous steps in alg_sub_t_m2 case. > > 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> > > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_1.c: New test. > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_2.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_3.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_4.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_5.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/aarch64/mult-synth_6.c: Likewise. >> >> >> jeff >> >
