On April 12, 2015 9:08:34 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On the following testcase, ICF assumes OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT must be a
>SSA_NAME, but that is not the case in the testcase, where it is
>ADDR_EXPR of MEM_REF instead.
>
>Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok
>for
>trunk?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

>2015-04-12  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>       PR tree-optimization/65747
>       * ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compare_operand): Use
>compare_operand
>       rather than compare_ssa_name for OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT.
>
>       * g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C: New test.
>
>--- gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c.jj    2015-03-14 09:49:39.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c       2015-04-12 17:12:37.093411034 +0200
>@@ -521,8 +521,8 @@ func_checker::compare_operand (tree t1,
>           if (!types_same_for_odr (obj_type_ref_class (t1),
>                                    obj_type_ref_class (t2)))
>             return return_false_with_msg ("OBJ_TYPE_REF OTR type mismatch");
>-          if (!compare_ssa_name (OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t1),
>-                                 OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t2)))
>+          if (!compare_operand (OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t1),
>+                                OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t2)))
>             return return_false_with_msg ("OBJ_TYPE_REF object mismatch");
>         }
> 
>--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C.jj  2015-04-12
>17:09:15.302632192 +0200
>+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C     2015-04-12
>17:11:39.003338317 +0200
>@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
>+// PR tree-optimization/65747
>+// { dg-do compile }
>+
>+struct A {};
>+struct E {
>+  virtual A m2();
>+} *a;
>+struct B {
>+  char b[sizeof (E)];
>+  void m1();
>+};
>+struct C {
>+  B c;
>+  void m3() { c.m1(); }
>+  friend class D;
>+};
>+struct D {
>+  int m4(C);
>+  void m5();
>+  void m6(int, C);
>+  void m7(int, C);
>+  void m8();
>+  bool m9();
>+  void m10(int);
>+  void m11(int);
>+};
>+void B::m1() { a = (E *)b; a->m2(); }
>+void D::m10(int) { m8(); }
>+void D::m11(int) { m8(); }
>+int D::m4(C p1) { p1.m3(); return 0; }
>+void D::m6(int, C p2) {
>+  int b = 0;
>+  if (m9()) {
>+    m4(p2);
>+    m10(b);
>+  } else
>+    m5();
>+  m10(int());
>+}
>+void D::m7(int, C p2) {
>+  int c = 0;
>+  if (m9()) {
>+    m4(p2);
>+    m11(c);
>+  } else
>+    m5();
>+  m11(int());
>+}
>
>       Jakub


Reply via email to