Hi! On the following testcase, ICF assumes OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT must be a SSA_NAME, but that is not the case in the testcase, where it is ADDR_EXPR of MEM_REF instead.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2015-04-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/65747 * ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compare_operand): Use compare_operand rather than compare_ssa_name for OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT. * g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C: New test. --- gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c.jj 2015-03-14 09:49:39.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c 2015-04-12 17:12:37.093411034 +0200 @@ -521,8 +521,8 @@ func_checker::compare_operand (tree t1, if (!types_same_for_odr (obj_type_ref_class (t1), obj_type_ref_class (t2))) return return_false_with_msg ("OBJ_TYPE_REF OTR type mismatch"); - if (!compare_ssa_name (OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t1), - OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t2))) + if (!compare_operand (OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t1), + OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (t2))) return return_false_with_msg ("OBJ_TYPE_REF object mismatch"); } --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C.jj 2015-04-12 17:09:15.302632192 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr65747.C 2015-04-12 17:11:39.003338317 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +// PR tree-optimization/65747 +// { dg-do compile } + +struct A {}; +struct E { + virtual A m2(); +} *a; +struct B { + char b[sizeof (E)]; + void m1(); +}; +struct C { + B c; + void m3() { c.m1(); } + friend class D; +}; +struct D { + int m4(C); + void m5(); + void m6(int, C); + void m7(int, C); + void m8(); + bool m9(); + void m10(int); + void m11(int); +}; +void B::m1() { a = (E *)b; a->m2(); } +void D::m10(int) { m8(); } +void D::m11(int) { m8(); } +int D::m4(C p1) { p1.m3(); return 0; } +void D::m6(int, C p2) { + int b = 0; + if (m9()) { + m4(p2); + m10(b); + } else + m5(); + m10(int()); +} +void D::m7(int, C p2) { + int c = 0; + if (m9()) { + m4(p2); + m11(c); + } else + m5(); + m11(int()); +} Jakub