On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch documents knl. The PR is asking for also documenting > slm, but I believe those were intentionally removed from the documentation > as deprecated aliases, at least that is my reading of the > 2013-12-23 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> > Tocar Ilya <ilya.to...@intel.com> > ... > * doc/invoke.texi: Replace corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i, > core-avx2, atom, slm with nehalem, sandybridge, ivybridge, > haswell, bonnel, silvermont. Add westmere. > change, so I think documenting knl is all we want right now. > Or should we use knightslanding and make knl an undocumented alias? H.J., any preferences here? I think that knightslanding is just too long (and two words), so I'd prefer knl. > 2015-03-10 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR target/65222 > * doc/invoke.texi: Add knl as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type. Let's wait for HJ, the patch is otherwise OK and safe for mainline. Thanks, Uros.
