On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:55 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> As documented in [1] asprintf and vasprintf return: > I assume that we can rely that any vasprintf implementation manages on > failure to at least either write NULL to *ret or to return -1, even if > some of them fail to do both? Yes, this is correct. The patch checks both ways. Please also note that linux manpages claim that in case of error, *ret will be undefined, while FreeBSD implementation will set *ret to NULL on error. > OK for trunk. Thanks, commited. Uros.
