On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 13:42 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This is broken on 4.9 and 4.8, so can we get those fixed as well?
> 
> Yes, please backport.

I committed this to trunk on Adhemerval's behalf as revision 220992.
I'll commit it to 4.9 and 4.8 after I bootstrap/regtest it there.


> Again, a testcase is highly encouraged.

I have a separate HTM fix coming which will fix PR64579 as well as
a few things that popped up when looking into that one.  I'm adding
a test case to that patch which should cover this.

Peter



Reply via email to