-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/11 11:05, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/07/11 10:58, Paul Koning wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> It'd also be nice to get rid of all these big blocks of code >>>>> that are conditional on preprocessor macros, but I realise >>>>> you're just following existing practice in the surrounding >>>>> code, so again it can be left to a future cleanup. >>>> >>>> Yeah, this function is quite horrid - so many different paths >>>> through it. >>>> >>>> However, it looks like the only target without HAVE_prologue is >>>> actually pdp11, so we're carrying some unnecessary baggage for >>>> purely retrocomputing purposes. Paul, can you fix that? >>> >>> Sure, but... I searched for HAVE_prologue and I can't find any >>> place that set it. There are tests for it, but I see nothing >>> that defines it (other than df-scan.c which defines it as zero if >>> it's not defined, not sure what the point of that is). >>> >>> I must be missing something... >> Isn't it defined by the insn-foo generators based on the existence >> of a prologue/epilogue insn in the MD file? > > Thanks, that must be what I was missing. So someone is generating > HAVE_%s, and that's why grep didn't find HAVE_prologue? Yup.
Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFefZAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7Q1wH/R/vdaJUQfF732FZyuAHSMMu TcDFJT4+uL4r5WaqBdrboyllLN0sJZYsXle/SDIMlL6wBMHDOmCykzEqWUC/Kukl YC6u1NabYlWp0KcZqB+o2+ge4aixahPc5IJiQ/WHU9aT7/7t6VePYVSI8O9p7FjI VXAtzrd7rrXpZnarTBHrbnmPOq/BIBzYM33kPUwThPkvy+NpYWWMPrH2moeN8EFM 1D9CATQTy3ysUGyLpxxIxNKmWqS/wJyl6+JycOE8aws9hiCclnlOdaI9yiKnU1Ht cJut1tCv987VUidyEvKKGv/iDHm8fvTEPQ+EuwB3zD9bRqVM/cSRq2RKAdOiXoE= =laeg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
