On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:05 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >>> > diff --git a/gcc/function.c b/gcc/function.c >>> > index 81c4d39..131bc09 100644 >>> > --- a/gcc/function.c >>> > +++ b/gcc/function.c >>> > @@ -4780,7 +4780,7 @@ expand_function_start (tree subr) >>> > cfun->nonlocal_goto_save_area, >>> > integer_zero_node, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE); >>> > r_save = expand_expr (t_save, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE); >>> > - r_save = convert_memory_address (Pmode, r_save); >>> > + r_save = adjust_address (r_save, Pmode, 0); >> >> This is actually the same problem as in explow.c. t_save is built with >> ptr_type_node, where it should have been using >> TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (cfun->nonlocal_goto_save_area)) >> >> Then r_save should have the correct mode already, possibly this could be >> asserted. You are right that r_save needs to correspond to the >> nonlocal_goto_save_area[0] array-ref, hence pseudos aren't okay, therefore >> convert_memory_address isn't. Actually I think we might even want to >> assert that indeed the expanded r_save is of Pmode already. >> >> > > This patch works for me. OK for trunk if there are no regressions?
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks. > > > -- > H.J. > --- > 2011-06-30 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> > > PR middle-end/48016 > * explow.c (update_nonlocal_goto_save_area): Use proper mode > for stack save area. > * function.c (expand_function_start): Likewise. >
