Hi, On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > diff --git a/gcc/function.c b/gcc/function.c > > index 81c4d39..131bc09 100644 > > --- a/gcc/function.c > > +++ b/gcc/function.c > > @@ -4780,7 +4780,7 @@ expand_function_start (tree subr) > > cfun->nonlocal_goto_save_area, > > integer_zero_node, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE); > > r_save = expand_expr (t_save, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE); > > - r_save = convert_memory_address (Pmode, r_save); > > + r_save = adjust_address (r_save, Pmode, 0); This is actually the same problem as in explow.c. t_save is built with ptr_type_node, where it should have been using TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (cfun->nonlocal_goto_save_area)) Then r_save should have the correct mode already, possibly this could be asserted. You are right that r_save needs to correspond to the nonlocal_goto_save_area[0] array-ref, hence pseudos aren't okay, therefore convert_memory_address isn't. Actually I think we might even want to assert that indeed the expanded r_save is of Pmode already. Ciao, Michael.
