Re: [PATCH] Use TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT instead of TREE_CHAIN as chain_next for types during GC (PR c++/46400)

[Richard Henderson]

On 06/24/2011 07:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> +       chain_next ("CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (TREE_CODE (&%h.generic), 
> TS_TYPE_COMMON) ? ((union lang_tree_node *) TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (&%h.generic)) 
> : CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (TREE_CODE (&%h.generic), TS_COMMON) ? ((union 
> lang_tree_node *) TREE_CHAIN (&%h.generic)) : NULL"))) lang_tree_node {

Is it possible to break this out into an inline (or, i suppose, out of line)
function?  This is getting fairly unreadable...


r~