On May 30, 2011, Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 05/30/2011 12:35 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> One of my patches for PR 48866 regressed guality/asm-1.c on >> x86_64-linux-gnu because what used to be a single complex debug value >> expression became a chain of debug temps holding simpler expressions, >> and this chain exceeded the default recursion depth in resolving >> location expressions.
> What's the worst that can happen if you remove the limit altogether? Exponential behavior comes to mind. I will try a bootstrap with a very high value, but for pathological cases we'd probably still need the param anyway, so I'll check it in. Thanks for the reviews. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
