On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:07, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For LTO we have type-merging for that, and we'd continue to pre-load > the type merger with the (LTO frontend specific) common tree nodes. OK. For LTO it may make sense to eventually make this hook a nop, then. > I suppose you are not doing any merging at all? If so pre-loading those > nodes makes indeed sense (given you have a way to reject PPH images > when flags such as -f[un]signed-char differ ...). There will be some amount of merging, but I'm anticipating using the same merging scheme used by the parser. As far as the parser is concerned, pph images are not much different than a regular header file. What changes is the way those declarations get loaded in memory. Diego.
