2011/4/2 Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com>: > 2011/4/2 H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> 2011/4/1 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>: >>>> On 04/01/2011 11:36 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >>>>> It might be a good thing to extract those call-abi lookups into a >>>>> specific function, which returns numbers for the selected on. By this >>>>> we can avoid double lookup of attributes here. >>>>> But I would like to do this in a separate patch. >>>> >>>> Sure. >>>> >>>> >>>> r~ >>>> >>> >>> Committed at revision 171890. >>> >> >> This caused: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48416 >> >> You changed ix86_function_arg_boundary: >> >> @@ -7441,8 +7485,10 @@ ix86_function_arg_boundary (enum machine_mode >> mode, const_tree type) >> warned = true; >> inform (input_location, >> "The ABI for passing parameters with %d-byte" >> - " alignment has changed in GCC 4.6", >> - align / BITS_PER_UNIT); >> + " alignment has changed in GCC 4.6 (mode:%u, %d saved", >> + align / BITS_PER_UNIT, >> + ix86_compat_function_arg_boundary (mode, type, >> saved_align), >> + mode, saved_align); >> } >> } >> >> >> But it isn't mentioned in ChangeLog nor your submission. Did you check it >> in by accident? > > Ups, yes. I'll correct it immediately > > Kai >
Corrected at revision 171891. Kai
