2011/4/2 H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> 2011/4/1 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>: >>> On 04/01/2011 11:36 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >>>> It might be a good thing to extract those call-abi lookups into a >>>> specific function, which returns numbers for the selected on. By this >>>> we can avoid double lookup of attributes here. >>>> But I would like to do this in a separate patch. >>> >>> Sure. >>> >>> >>> r~ >>> >> >> Committed at revision 171890. >> > > This caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48416 > > You changed ix86_function_arg_boundary: > > @@ -7441,8 +7485,10 @@ ix86_function_arg_boundary (enum machine_mode > mode, const_tree type) > warned = true; > inform (input_location, > "The ABI for passing parameters with %d-byte" > - " alignment has changed in GCC 4.6", > - align / BITS_PER_UNIT); > + " alignment has changed in GCC 4.6 (mode:%u, %d saved", > + align / BITS_PER_UNIT, > + ix86_compat_function_arg_boundary (mode, type, saved_align), > + mode, saved_align); > } > } > > > But it isn't mentioned in ChangeLog nor your submission. Did you check it > in by accident?
Ups, yes. I'll correct it immediately Kai
