Hi, On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> Uh, well - the information is readily available from SVN > > > > Hmm, you have a very unusual definition of "readily available" :) > > Well - of course svn sucks, but > > > svn log --stop-on-copy svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/<branch-name> | > > tail > > works for me. And takes 57 seconds for 4_1_branch (it seems gcc.gnu.org is fast today). > We also don't include the branch name - it is "readily available by > construction from elsewhere documented scheme". branch names == convention, svn revisions == unambiguous specification. > I think it clutters the ascii art - where do you stop with adding other > "useful" information? At the point where more people find it inconvenient than useful. Ciao, Michael.