On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> > GCC 4.7 Stage 1 (starts 2011-03-14) GCC 4.6.0 release (2011-03-25) >> > - | >> > + | r171512 >> > | >> > v >> > >> > The idea is to include the copy-source revision on the trunk or the >> > respective branch, so that you can use the timeline to check whether a >> > particular change came before or after a release. Of course, this is >> > just an approximation, but it think it might still be useful. >> >> Uh, well - the information is readily available from SVN > > Hmm, you have a very unusual definition of "readily available" :)
Well - of course svn sucks, but > svn log --stop-on-copy svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/<branch-name> | tail works for me. >> so I don't think this is very useful. > > It certainly doesn't do any harm so if some people find it useful (and at > least Florian does) there's no reason to not include it. We also don't include the branch name - it is "readily available by construction from elsewhere documented scheme". I think it clutters the ascii art - where do you stop with adding other "useful" information? Richard. > > Ciao, > Michael.
