https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126906
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > BTW, neither of these commits have tests associated with them. How about we > retroactively distill tests for them, commit them independently, so whatever > fix we come up with does not regress those? For example, like this. I’ve gone back in time and made testcases for the commits that fail without the original patches and pass with them. They are reduced from the original preprocessed sources, and also contain a further reduced minimal testcase. I have added Assisted-by tags to both patches, as all the work was done by AI. Per our policy, tests are fair game, so I assume I can contribute as is? I would adjust the commit message of course, as that was entirely generated. Would something like this be appropriate?
