https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122970
Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> I agree it's a candidate, but I can't get either the original test or the
> slightly smaller one you checked in with this patch to fail with gcc-15. It
> may just be latent -- the basic code structure is still in gcc-15, though in
> a different place.
>
> Going to wait on you to decide best course of action here. I'd slightly
> lean towards closing, but I could support other sensible actions.
Yeah, I didn't manage to trigger it either. I agree that closing seems the
(very) slightly favorable choice right now. So I'm going to do that. In case
it re-emerges we can still go ahead with the backport.
