https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122955
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dhruv Chawla from comment #13)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> > Created attachment 62974 [details]
> > patch to try
> >
> > Can you try this patch?
> >
> > Basically chain_next/chain_prev is only taken into account from the base
> > class.
>
> Thanks for the patch, this does seem to fix it!
Good to know. It is not the final patch just one that confirms what I thought
was the issue is actually the issue.
Richi suggested moving next/previous to toplevel_node and I think that is a
good idea. So I will work on doing that today.
