https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122955
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2025-12-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
gt_ggc_mx_symtab_node used to be:
void
gt_ggc_mx_symtab_node (void *x_p)
{
struct symtab_node * x = (struct symtab_node *)x_p;
struct symtab_node * xlimit = x;
while (ggc_test_and_set_mark (xlimit))
xlimit = ((*xlimit).next);
if (x != xlimit)
And then use gt_ggc_m_11symtab_node (gt_ggc_mx_symtab_node) so it would mark to
the limit first and then do the correct thing. as that was the only marker
function called it would be good.
BUT now we have:
gt_ggc_mx_toplevel_node which does not do the whole chain_next.
And it uses gt_ggc_m_13toplevel_node (even for symtab_node * types fields).
So chain_next is never used here.
