https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121007
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This is definitely sounding more and more like PR 93658. Yes, and maybe the error / fix / workaround will be similar: replace a VECTOR_MEM_ALTIVEC_P by VECTOR_MEM_ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_P (what a nasty name, it does not say at all what it really is testing, not something a (sane) user would care about anyway). So LRA gets into an infinite loop here as well, do we know that to be true already, is that actually seen?
