https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121007
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2025-07-09 Keywords| |needs-reduction, ra Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Changing address in insn 138 r466:DI&0xfffffffffffffff0 on equiv sfp:DI-0x10&0xfffffffffffffff0 Creating newreg=569, assigning class BASE_REGS to base r569 Creating newreg=570, assigning class BASE_REGS to base r570 Creating newreg=571, assigning class BASE_REGS to base r571 insn 138 is: (insn 138 258 49 3 (set (reg:V16QI 236 [ _128 ]) (mem:V16QI (and:DI (reg/f:DI 466) (const_int -16 [0xfffffffffffffff0])) [0 MEM <vector(16) signed char> [(void *)_127]+0 S16 A128])) "libavcodec/ppc/h264dsp.c":650:67 1148 {vsx_movv16qi_64bit} (nil)) This is definitely sounding more and more like PR 93658.