https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120846
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 1 Jul 2025, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120846 > > --- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I think the test should be split up into separate tests, one for each > function, > so you can simply demand that the vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern is detected, > without specifying a number. That would also allow the "vectorized 1 loops" > test to consider just one > function, and then the test run only if the dotproduct for the particular mode > and signedness is supported. I agree splitting up the testcase makes it easier to sort out all the possibilities.
