https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
--- Comment #10 from cuilili <lili.cui at intel dot com> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #9) > Thanks both. > > H.J.'s is slightly less pessimising because it'll only affect functions > where we actually emit a call, but I don't think it really matters here, and > matching the general shrinkwrap logic seems better in case that was added > for other reasons. > > So either WFM. I actually have the same concern, it's a bit strange that enabling -fprofile or -fg would cause execution time changes. H.J. Can we insert mcount after NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG just like -mfentry? Thanks, Lili.
