https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > Created attachment 61780 [details] > A patch This will mean distributions that default to SSP (-fstack-protector-strong) don't benefit from separate shrink wrapping at all unless the function has no chance to corrupt the stack, right? That's a shame (but I don't know what alternatives there could be).
