https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 31 Mar 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 > > --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I don't see how we could do the regeneration without actually building > something unless we want to duplicate everything (in the posted patch, the > libffi.info regeneration is an example of duplication, the rest just uses a > make target). > We need something that will at least configure gcc etc. Sure, we need to configure. But I wonder if then, with adding a toplevel srcextra / srcinfo rule we can just invoke that. That said, the purpose of this bug was to notice we miss some generated files in the tarballs. How to fix that is secondary IMO (though having snapshots and release tarballs behave the same would be very nice).
