https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > That can be problematic for languages which have special requirements (Ada, > D). > I guess this isn't done when building snapshots and both of us run gcc_release > for releases locally rather than on sourceware, so perhaps it could work. > Still, for COBOL I'm not even sure it doesn't always generate files in object > directory rather than source directory. We can also selectively add languages, but then build will likely fail when makeinfo isn't available - it's not documented to be required (but I figured when it is, it will re-generate files anyway, for example failing with complaints for old release tarballs with "broken" .texi files)
