https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Michael Duggan from comment #17) > Gcov doesn't have access to the function declaration, only to the > information that has been output to the count and graph files. Neither of > those contain any information (as far as I can tell) that would identify a > function as an actor function other than the name. These files could > potentially be augmented, but that would require a gcov version bump and > updating the code to DTRT based on the version. That is beyond what I'm > interested in implementing currently. OK.. so I'd go ahead with that version. > (For that matter, I'm not certain how best, even in gcc itself, to determine > if a function is an actor function after it has been created other than its > name. I don't think it flags it with anything special other than the > artificial flag.) coroutine decls are marked as such (they have a flag in the lag-specific data) and it is also possible to determine _which_ function is in play (ramp, actor, destroyer). But that's academic at the moment - a gcov bump would not be a stage #4 kind of thing, I'd expect.
